Header Ads Widget

Would you rather have a physique like Dwayne Johnson or Zac Efron?

Hmm, Let me think.. no

Let’s do some comparisons.

Dwayne (“The Rock”) Johnson

  1. 6.5 feet tall
  2. Huge muscles
  3. Decent abs
  4. Probably not natural
  5. Hulky

Zac Efron(“celebrity crush of all girls but looks like a little bit of a fuckboy(no offense)”).

1. 5.8 feet tall

2.Developed very decent muscles

3. Shredded 8 pack

4. Not sure if it’s natural

5. Agile

If I’m being honest I’m picking Zac. (I’m not going to talk about the naturalness of their physique because honestly, I’m just judging the use of the physique, not the attainability.)

Here’s why:

1. He has a lot more core(abs) strength

That’s gonna help in any situation. I personally need abs strength for my gymnastics but if you have a good core it helps you to move around with ease and be aware of your body and its stability.

2. He’s more Agile and flexible.

If you have that you have more control over your body, which means you can work in uncomfortable situations.

3. He still has very decent muscles

They might not be as giant as Dwayne's but they are strong enough along with his upper body to let him do what he needs in terms of strength.

Mainly what I mean is

The rock might be able to do this with ease.

But does he need to though?

Is he a van carrier or something?

We have machines for that.

Despite the script of the movie I sincerely doubt he can do this. which actually might be a plausible situation.

This:

to

This:


Thanks for Viewing 😊👍

Post a Comment

0 Comments

'; (function() { var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = '//' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq); })();